Сравнение эффективности кинестетической гаптической обратной связи со зрительной при работе с ИМК на моторном воображении
The objective of this study was to develop a BCI with kinaesthetic haptic feedback based on the detected motor imagery, and compare its performance to using visual feedback. The participants completed the BCI training with an average accuracy of 67.28 ± 11.2% for visual feedback and 75.12 ± 12.3% for kinaesthetic haptic feedback. The BCI training with kinaesthetic haptic feedback resulted in less workload and statistically higher classification accuracy than visual feedback (p = 0.03).
Sakamaki I, Tavakoli M, Wiebe S, Adams K. Examination of effectiveness of kinaesthetic haptic feedback for motor imagery-based brain-computer interface training. Brain-Computer Interfaces. 2022 Sep 2, 1-22 https://doi.org/10.1080/2326263X.2022.2114225
Странно... действительно ли никто раньше не сравнивал?!
UPD: см еще о том же Zhong et al -- https://t.me/bci_ru/586
The objective of this study was to develop a BCI with kinaesthetic haptic feedback based on the detected motor imagery, and compare its performance to using visual feedback. The participants completed the BCI training with an average accuracy of 67.28 ± 11.2% for visual feedback and 75.12 ± 12.3% for kinaesthetic haptic feedback. The BCI training with kinaesthetic haptic feedback resulted in less workload and statistically higher classification accuracy than visual feedback (p = 0.03).
Sakamaki I, Tavakoli M, Wiebe S, Adams K. Examination of effectiveness of kinaesthetic haptic feedback for motor imagery-based brain-computer interface training. Brain-Computer Interfaces. 2022 Sep 2, 1-22 https://doi.org/10.1080/2326263X.2022.2114225
Странно... действительно ли никто раньше не сравнивал?!
UPD: см еще о том же Zhong et al -- https://t.me/bci_ru/586