I think we are entering a phase where there are people who know how to use LLMs to get the best results (who ask it to come up with the best prompt first, rather than writing it on their own or just dropping the prof's assignment in, and who add all kinds of instructions to Claude Cowork, etc.), and people who don't. Those who don't know will give the impression that LLMs are not capable of doing what historians can do (and that makes us feel like we still have a place/role). However, it's the papers written by the people who DO know what to do that we need to pay attention to.