Репост из: Rybar in English
📝Once again on rational use📝
In the context of the loss of a Ka-52 with crew in the Pokrovsk direction, it's worth separately clarifying what the phrase "there are no more targets in the SMO zone that can be covered by a package of unguided rockets from a climb" means.
On TACTIKAR we showed how and why the front line has become almost depopulated. Assault operations are conducted by groups of three and two, while strongpoints are basements and other improvised shelters with minimal infantry, supplied by drones.
Therefore, a situation where a village can "hold" for months with fewer than 10 people is now common. Often it comes down to the fact that in a neighboring basement there may already be Russian fighters who managed to infiltrate covertly and "not give away their position".
❓Attention, question: how can a launch of half a package of unguided rockets from a climb with their enormous accuracy and penetration help them in such a situation?
What would actually help? Well, at least an FPV drone that will definitely fly straight into the strongpoint. And if it's also capable of delivering a mine or incendiary munition like the same "Upyr-18", then one hit is enough to kill everything alive there.
❗️Yes, they may not reach on the first try due to jamming, piloting errors and other things. Yes, you can spend a dozen drones on a basement. But this is still incomparably more effective than launching rockets from a climb.
And it goes without saying that the cost of a heavy FPV drone with a TM-62 is simply incomparable to the price of even a single Ka-52 sortie. Not to mention the helicopter itself and especially its crew.
So a mere rational redistribution and use of even current resources will lead to fundamental changes in many aspects on the battlefield. And at the same time — save considerable funds, which is also quite relevant.
#UAV #Russia
✈ RU | ✈ EN | ✉ MAX
✉ VK | ✉ RuTube | ✉ OK | ✉ Zen
💸Support Original msg
In the context of the loss of a Ka-52 with crew in the Pokrovsk direction, it's worth separately clarifying what the phrase "there are no more targets in the SMO zone that can be covered by a package of unguided rockets from a climb" means.
On TACTIKAR we showed how and why the front line has become almost depopulated. Assault operations are conducted by groups of three and two, while strongpoints are basements and other improvised shelters with minimal infantry, supplied by drones.
Therefore, a situation where a village can "hold" for months with fewer than 10 people is now common. Often it comes down to the fact that in a neighboring basement there may already be Russian fighters who managed to infiltrate covertly and "not give away their position".
❓Attention, question: how can a launch of half a package of unguided rockets from a climb with their enormous accuracy and penetration help them in such a situation?
What would actually help? Well, at least an FPV drone that will definitely fly straight into the strongpoint. And if it's also capable of delivering a mine or incendiary munition like the same "Upyr-18", then one hit is enough to kill everything alive there.
❗️Yes, they may not reach on the first try due to jamming, piloting errors and other things. Yes, you can spend a dozen drones on a basement. But this is still incomparably more effective than launching rockets from a climb.
And it goes without saying that the cost of a heavy FPV drone with a TM-62 is simply incomparable to the price of even a single Ka-52 sortie. Not to mention the helicopter itself and especially its crew.
So a mere rational redistribution and use of even current resources will lead to fundamental changes in many aspects on the battlefield. And at the same time — save considerable funds, which is also quite relevant.
#UAV #Russia
✈ RU | ✈ EN | ✉ MAX
✉ VK | ✉ RuTube | ✉ OK | ✉ Zen
💸Support Original msg