Репост из: Rybar in English
📝Laser for JDAM bombs📝
What are the technical limitations in destroying large enemy bridges? In part, it's a situation where some weapons lack precision, while others lack warhead mass. To some degree, this problem has persisted since the first attempts to strike such targets at the start of the SMO.
One can solve it, for example, through high-intensity strikes on such bridges using gliding bombs on the principle of "one out of ten will hit where needed." But there are also fundamental technical possibilities to increase accuracy.
One option is laser targeting, when on the final leg the bomb flies to the point that a complex mounted on a drone "illuminates." For example, this is how the guided munitions "Krasnopilia" work, which the Orlan-30 UAV guides.
The advantages are obvious: the beam can be directed at a specific support of the same bridge or the floor of a building where the drone crew sits. Compared to coordinate-based guidance, accuracy will be higher, even when setting figures by altitude.
Yes, the idea has its nuances. But there are far more possibilities for implementation than in 2022-2023. Moreover, the targeting complex could theoretically be mounted on different types of "large" UAVs, not limited to the Orlan-30.
❗️This does not mean that "conventional" JDAM or JDAB bombs will not be needed — we are talking about expanding the weapons nomenclature. The wider it is, the greater the flexibility in accomplishing the task and the higher the probability of success.
#aviation #bridges #Russia #Ukraine
✈️ RU | ✈️ EN | ✉️ MAX
✉️ VK | ✉️ RuTube | ✉️ OK | ✉️ Zen
💸Support us Original msg
What are the technical limitations in destroying large enemy bridges? In part, it's a situation where some weapons lack precision, while others lack warhead mass. To some degree, this problem has persisted since the first attempts to strike such targets at the start of the SMO.
One can solve it, for example, through high-intensity strikes on such bridges using gliding bombs on the principle of "one out of ten will hit where needed." But there are also fundamental technical possibilities to increase accuracy.
One option is laser targeting, when on the final leg the bomb flies to the point that a complex mounted on a drone "illuminates." For example, this is how the guided munitions "Krasnopilia" work, which the Orlan-30 UAV guides.
The advantages are obvious: the beam can be directed at a specific support of the same bridge or the floor of a building where the drone crew sits. Compared to coordinate-based guidance, accuracy will be higher, even when setting figures by altitude.
Yes, the idea has its nuances. But there are far more possibilities for implementation than in 2022-2023. Moreover, the targeting complex could theoretically be mounted on different types of "large" UAVs, not limited to the Orlan-30.
❗️This does not mean that "conventional" JDAM or JDAB bombs will not be needed — we are talking about expanding the weapons nomenclature. The wider it is, the greater the flexibility in accomplishing the task and the higher the probability of success.
#aviation #bridges #Russia #Ukraine
✈️ RU | ✈️ EN | ✉️ MAX
✉️ VK | ✉️ RuTube | ✉️ OK | ✉️ Zen
💸Support us Original msg